Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Parallel - Chapter Five

Click here for audio


Chapter 5
Miracles

           Miracles are at the center of the modern day focus on Jesus life. More than anything else, the non-believing population scrutinizes miracles stories as fables and myth. Are they? Maybe that is not the right question here. Maybe the right question is why the writers spent so much time including them in the story of Jesus. Of the stories in the Gospel accounts, the miracle stories are clearly a favorite subject matter. Matthew has 22 miracles, Mark 18 while Luke has 21. John on the other hand only has 7 miracle stories and John indicates that they are in the Gospel so that the reader would know that Jesus is God, a central point of John’s Gospel. I have included 16 miracles that move across the synoptic gospel accounts. Some of the more famous have been left out with the most likely reason being that they only exist in one of the Gospel accounts. However, there are some exceptions. The raising of Lazarus from the dead appears in both John (11:38-53) and Luke (7:12-17). What should be of note here is that Luke never identifies who the man is that is raised from the dead and the story is very different. Luke may have been trying to hide Lazarus identity. There are stories of that time that suggest that the Jewish leadership would have placed a bounty on Lazarus head in fear if what his resurrection might truly say about Jesus.
           Of the 16 miracles, please note that four of them also appear in John as part of his seven. They are the healing of the Paralytic (chapter 5: 8-9), the centurion (chapter 4: 46-54), the feeding of the five thousand (chapter 6: 1-15), and Jesus walking on water (chapter 6: 16-21).
           The three synoptic writers desire to make a statement about who Jesus is. In order to justify their position, it is important that Jesus show His divine nature. Power over nature, exorcism of demons and healing are all considered to be part of the power of God alone in Jesus day. Hence, the special emphasis of healing (8 of the 16), exorcism (4 of the 16) and power over nature (4 of the 16). Matthew clearly is focused on telling the story to the Jewish community and proclaiming Jesus as Messiah. In order to justify that position Jesus must have divine ability that cannot be attributed to medicine or known healing practices of the day. No-one was able to heal Lepers in Jesus day except Jesus. No-one could fix hemorrhage problems or birth defects. So Matthew focuses on those kind of healing to lift up. Matthew identifies Jesus miracles on Exorcism (3 of the 15), healing (8 of the 15) and power over nature (4 of the 15). Luke on the other hand is a doctor as we understand his background. We also know that he worked with Paul. His focus was on the Gentile world and proclaiming Jesus to be the Son of Man. Luke wants us to see the humanity in Jesus and wants the Gentile world to understand Jesus as fully human and fully God. Luke focuses then more on the healing miracles (7 of the 12), power over nature (2 of the 12) and exorcism (3 of the 12).
           Remember that Mark’s gospel is focused sharing that Jesus is God to the Roman world. So his focus is shared on the exorcism of demons (4 out of 16), healing (8 out of 16) and the power over nature (4 out of 16). It is important to Mark that the reader experience his viewpoint that Jesus is good over evil so much of healing narrative also shows issues with the Jewish leadership. Mark and Matthew have two feeding stories. Did both happen? Mark and Matthew felt compelled to include them both. Remember that Luke’s focus is on the healing much more than power over nature.
           The list of sixteen miracles that I have included share Jesus power over nature, His ability to exorcise evil spirits and His healing power. Several of them have a great powerful message of faith like the Centurion who asks for healing even though Jesus is not physically there. If we read the accounts, note the differences and ask yourself how the version fits in the greater story and the audience of the writer.
           Many of the commentaries that I use include a note that not a single healing was for the sole purpose of physical healing. In Jesus day, to be ill, often meant to be excluded from family and community. Healing by Jesus not only addressed the physical issue, but also restored people to community, family and God.

No comments:

Post a Comment